The Massachusetts Mortgage Blog

News, Information and Insight into the Mortgage World By David Gaffin, Greenpark Mortgage

Browsing Posts published by David Gaffin

So, after about 14 phone calls to my Congressman, the House Majority Leader’s office, the Clerk of the House of Representative’s office, they finally listened. The House of Representatives has voted to extend the closing date for the first time home buyer tax credit until September 30, 2010.

Beginning last week I began my phone campaign to extend the closing date for the tax credit after the Senate approved an amendment, but not the bill to do just this.

I know others with a greater voice than me were doing the same.  However, sometimes you have to get involved when your Government can do something easy and right.

As of  last Friday, nothing was on the House agenda to extend the closing date.  I called again yesterday, and again nothing was scheduled. So it was with a happy heart that I saw this on Boston.com.

The vote was 409-5 in favor.  If I am not mistaken, that is bi-partisan support.  So that’s the good news.

The bad news is that the Senate extension is tied to a bill that would extend Long Term Unemployment benefits.  I wish that the closing date extension was not tied to something so controversial. I do not wish to debate the merits or costs of extending jobless benefits.  I do want the Homebuyer’s extension to pass without delay.

I live each of my client’s transactions.  To me buying a home, especially your first,  is an incredible experience.  Most times it can be a wonderful one.  Occasionally, it can be more on the nightmarish side.

Given all of the changes in lending guidelines, appraisal value issues, etc., more and more deals are taking longer and are not as smooth as they have been even in the recent past.

Currently I have 2 deals for which the extension will make a big difference.  One involved probate and one is a short sale.  Through no fault of the buyer’s, these deals have been delayed.  The borrower’s should not be penalized due to the delays of others.  Hey, I wish I could have taken advantage of the program, but not in the cards.  I do not be-grudge anyone trying to be a part of this.

Has the government spent too much money?  That a topic for another post.

Your comments and insights are welcomed!

Share

Fixed Rate and Adjustable Rate mortgages continued their decline this week, hitting lows not seen since the early 1970′s when record keeping began. This is great news for homebuyer’s and those seeking to refinance their existing loans.

Originators and lock desks are swamped.  Should we be excited by this news?  On a personal level, it is good news.

On a Micro level, to paraphrase, all economics are local and therefore any savings realized by a consumer will likely help their pocketbook and spur savings or help meet obligations.   This is great for the homeowner that can save $100 or more a month and not back up their loan term.

On a Macro level, interest rates are low because the economy is still in a very fragile state, unemployment is exceedingly high and under-employment is out of site.  Home values are still very low and the despite goverment efforts, many consumers who would benefit from refinancing to a lower rate or payment, are unable to do so.

This leaves the few able to refinance.  The typical borrowers able to refinance today are either old school Americans who owned their homes for many years, learned the discipline of not borrowing more than they could afford, and did not use their homes as ATM machines to access cash whenever needed. Or, fiscally responsible buyers, who knew that putting 20% down on a new home would get them the best rate, who did not wish to be house poor and bought what they could afford given their earnings and lifestyles.  Those are all good things!!!

Unfortunately, there are not many of these borrowers left.  Massive layoffs and the housing bust have greatly reduced the number of eligible borrowers.

For those still able to access their home equity lines, being able to procure a re-subordination agreement, is a great feat indeed!  Many lenders will not resubordinate to a CLTV above 80% to protect themselves against further home value declines.  This may be prudent business.  Explain to me however, how one of these lenders will open a new home equity line to a CLTV of 95%, yet will only resubordinate an existing line to 80%.

Low interest rates can only spur so much economic activity.  The downside is that with so much government stimulus, despite the Fed Reserves assurances, inflation in the next several years could be so severe that Americans standard of living will continue to drop, those on fixed income will see their buying power erode more quickly, and our children and grand-children will be faced with much higher taxes to off-set the spectacular budget deficits that we are currently running.

So folks, enjoy the low rates if you are able, and count yourself lucky.  For everyone who can refinance, anectdotaly, I have at least 1 person who cannot.  We need to get out of this economic mess, and get people working again.  Because if unemployment does not improve soon, the housing market could erode even further as those long term unemployed walk away from their homes voluntarily or have them foreclosed, adding to an already large shadow inventory of bank owned properties.

I would welcome your comments and remember that low rates may not last long, so make sure you and your loved ones take advantage while they can!

For information on refinancing or purchasing a home please visit me at www.greenparkmortgage.com/davidgaffin.  I will be happy to review rate and program options.

Share

For the past several years I have been itching to creat a blog site that would be useful to industry professionals and the general public alike.  Previously, I  used  a website for the dissemination of information, but have determined that a blog will offer the most flexibility and timeliness to “get out the word” of what is happening in the marketplace.

In the upcoming days and weeks I will be touching on topics that will be affecting either buyers, sellers or both.  These topics will include the extension or not of the closing deadline for the first time home buyer credit, how the refusal of Congress to renew authorization for the National Flood Insurance holds dire consequences and how Congress’s failure to act on authorizing additnonal funds for the USDA Loan programs will continue to hold down the housing market and recovery.  Also look here for advise on mortgage rates, progams and qualifying.

Always know that you can reach me by email at davidgaffin@massmortgageblog.com.

Thank you for your time, it is valuable and I hope it is well spent here or visiting one of my blogroll sites.

Share

 

So, you thought getting a home loan for purchase or refinance before was confusing?  Well, I’ve got GREAT NEWS for you.  Your government has heard you and has come to help!  (Insert Sarcastic Mental Voice.)  HUD, the Housing and Urban Development agency, has dismantled the previous 1 page Good Faith Estimate that itemized most of the settlement charges for your loan and created a 4 page “simplified” GFE to ‘help borrowers understand and compare the costs associated with obtaining a mortgage.’  

HUD is trying to do at least 2 things for consumers: 1. Protect the consumer from dealing with shady mortgage companies that will disclose certain fees on the GFE, and then charge higher or additional fees at the closing table and 2. Encourage consumers to use the GFE as a shopping tool to ensure a fair deal.  An informed consumer will typically make better choices than an ill-informed one, so the premise behind the changes to the new GFE is a worthwhile one.  However, there are several areas where a consumer may not be able to compare the costs of loan programs on an equal basis and thus make the most appropriate loan choice.

Page 1 of the GFE groups together all of the Adjusted Origination Charges (e.g. processing and underwriting fees, points, doc prep, etc.) as one figure and the Charges for All Other Settlement Services (e.g. atty’s fees, P &S work, lenders title insurance, etc.)  associated with closing your loan as another figure and adds them together to come up with the Total Estimate Settlement Charges. 

It also spells out your loan amount, loan term, interest rate and the initial monthly payment for principal interest and any mortgage insurance.

However it does not include expected expenses for monthly real estate taxes, homeowners insurance, or home owner’s association dues.  It does not inform the borrower about expected funds needed to close the loan.  Because origination charges are all lumped together, the new GFE is not specific in disclosing the number of points required to close the loan.  It also does not include the APR or Annual Percentage Rate.

Page 2 breaks into sections the charges for All Other Settlement Services which will include such newly disclosed charges as Owner’s Title Insurance, (which is an optional, but recommended purchase) and Transfer Taxes.  In many states, the Transfer Taxes are disclosed as a borrower–related cost, even though the borrower may not be responsible for this cost, thereby inflating the Total Charge Estimate.

Escrow funding for reserves of real estate taxes, home owner’s insurance and mortgage insurance are included in this section.  However, despite the fact that this total sum should be uniform across lenders, the new GFE allows the lender to quote whatever number of months of reserves they choose, resulting in a variance of hundreds or thousands of dollars when comparing GFEs.  This is not a borrower savings from lender to lender. At settlement these charges will be the same for all lenders.  This could result in the borrower unexpectedly bringing additional funds to the closing.  Some mortgage companies will try to gain a competitive advantage by initially disclosing lower escrow totals.  This would be an unfair and deceptive trade practice to the consumer.

Page 3 gives the consumer information about which expense items on the GFE cannot increase at settlement, which one’s can have a total increase of a 10% increase and which ones can change without limit.  The origination charges cannot change at settlement.

Page 4 helps the consumer by listing Settlement Service Providers that they can choose.

I have been in the mortgage industry for many years and have advanced educational degrees.  I have passed my required national and state licensing exams and even I find this form to be confusing and not very helpful when comparing loans.  My job as a loan consultant is to inform and educate my clients so that we arrive at the best loan program for them with the least costs based on their needs.  I use different tools to compare programs, including cost/benefit analysis, total interest paid comparisons, length of loan term reviews, etc., but, with the new GFE rules, I must disclose 1 loan program within 3 business days of collecting 6 points of entry for an application.  If I fail to do so, even if the borrower and I have not determined the best program for them yet, I am in violation of the law.  I do not see how this helps the borrower determine the best loan program.

I will give HUD credit for trying, and as this is now the law of the land it is what we must all work with, however, given the vast departure from the look and feel of the previous form, it is going to take a lot of education on the part of loan officers, realtors and attorneys to establish a comfort level with the borrower’s understanding of the form.

When a borrower chooses a lender, they should be referred by someone they trust, should check out the lender’s and loan officer’s reputation by reviewing its website or other public information and feel comfortable that the loan officer is knowledgeable, understands their needs and has the borrower’s best interests in mind.  Then a GFE received from that company can be viewed as a Good Faith Accurate, and not just a Good Faith Estimate.

This post was oringinally published on The Massachusetts Real Estate Law Blog.

Share
Sharing Buttons by Linksku